GPT-5 nano vs Gemini 2.0 Flash Comparison
Ultra-budget AI comparison: OpenAI's GPT-5 nano vs Google's Gemini 2.0 Flash. Maximum efficiency analysis.
Quick Summary
Gemini 2.0 Flash offers better value with larger context and multimodal capabilities, while GPT-5 nano provides ultra-low cost.
Winner: Gemini 2.0 Flash
Pricing Comparison
GPT-5 nano
Input
$0.05/1M tokens
Output
$0.4/1M tokens
Gemini 2.0 Flash
Input
$0.1/1M tokens
Output
$0.4/1M tokens
Key Differences
- Gemini 2.0 Flash is 2x more expensive ($0.10 vs $0.05 input)
- Gemini 2.0 Flash has 1M context vs 64K
- Gemini 2.0 Flash has multimodal capabilities
- GPT-5 nano offers the lowest cost per token
- Both excel at high-volume applications
Best Use Cases
GPT-5 nano
- Ultra-high-volume applications
- Edge computing
- Minimal cost requirements
- Simple AI tasks
- Resource-constrained environments
Gemini 2.0 Flash
- Multimodal applications
- Agent-based systems
- Large context needs
- Balanced cost and capability
- Google ecosystem integration